21. Mukherjee, S., & Srinivasan, N. (in press). Hedonic impacts of gains versus losses of time: Are we loss averse? Cognition and Emotion doi:10.1080/02699931.2021.1907741
20. Mukherjee, S. (2019). Revise the belief in loss aversion. Frontiers in Psychology 10:2723 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02723 [PDF]
19. Mukherjee, S., & Sahay, A. (2018). Nocebo effects from negative product information: when information hurts, paying money could heal. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(1), 32-39. doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2015-1609 [ABDC - A category]
18. Mukherjee, S., Srinivasan, N., Kumar, N., & Manjaly, J. A. (2018). Perceptual broadening leads to more prosociality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1821. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01821 [PDF]
17. Mukherjee, S., Sahay, A., Pammi, C.V.S., & Srinivasan, N. (2017). Is Loss-aversion magnitude dependent? Measuring prospective affective judgments regarding gains and losses. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(1), 81-89. [HTML] [PDF] [ABDC - A category]
16. Mehta, V., Mukherjee, S., & Manjaly, J.A. (2017). Can lighting influence self-disclosure? Frontiers in Psychology 8:234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00234 [PDF]
15. Bouwmeester, S., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Aczel, B., …, Mukherjee, S., …, & Wollbrant, C. E. (2017). Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 527-542. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693624 [PDF]
14. Tybur, J.M., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L., … Mukherjee, S., …Žeželjll, I. (2016). Parasite Stress and Pathogen Avoidance Relate to Distinct Dimensions of Political Ideology Across 30 Nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(44), 12408-12413. doi:10.1073/pnas.1607398113 [PDF]
13. Mukherjee, S., Manjaly, J. A., & Kumar, N. (2015). Role of Money in Creative Cognition. In Manjaly J. A. & Indurkhya, B. (Eds). Cognition Experience and Creativity. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan
12. Sahay, A., Mukherjee, S. & Dewani, P. P. (2015). Price discount framings on product bundles with shipping surcharges in the Indian market: Examining the weighted-additive and reference-dependent models. Journal of Indian Business Research, 7(1), 4-20. doi:10.1108/JIBR-05-2014-0026 [ABDC - C category]
11. Mukherjee, S., Srinivasan, N., & Manjaly, J.A. (2014). Global processing fosters donations toward charity appeals framed in an approach orientation. Cognitive Processing, 15(3), 391-396. doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0602-8
10. Srinivasan, N. & Mukherjee, S. (2014). Even 'unconscious thought' is influenced by attentional mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 40-41. (Commentary). doi:10.1017/S0140525X1300085X
9. Mukherjee, S., & Srinivasan, N. (2013). Attention in preferential choice. Progress in Brain Research, 202, 117-134. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00007-1
8. Mukherjee, S., Manjaly. J.A ., & Nargundkar, M. (2013). Money makes you reveal more: Consequences of monetary cues on preferential disclosure of personal information. Frontiers in Psychology 4:839. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00839 [PDF] | {Times of India press coverage}
7. Srinivasan, N., Mukherjee, S., Mishra, M. V., & Kesarwani, S. (2013). Evaluating the role of attention in the context of unconscious thought theory: Differential impact of attentional scope and load on preference and memory. Frontiers in Psychology 4:37. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00037 [PDF]
6. Mukherjee, S. (2013). Concerns with attempts by neuroeconomics to answer the philosophical question “Is it rational to donate money for charity?” Frontiers in Psychology, 4:585. (commentary) doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00585 [PDF]
5. Srinivasan, N., & Mukherjee, S. (2010). Attribute preference and selection in multi-attribute decision making: Implications for unconscious and conscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 644 - 652. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.002
4. Manjaly, J. A. Mukherjee, S. (2009). Cognitive Evolutionary Psychology: A prospective but temperate view. Sandhan: Journal of Centre for Studies in Civilizations, 9(2), 183-197.
Related to India
3. Mukherjee, S. (2016). Isn't it yet time for Indian government to have a behavioral science unit? Psychological Studies, 61(2), 91-95. doi:10.1007/s12646-016-0357-7
2. Mukherjee, S., & Sahay, A. (2016). Predicted satisfaction from simultaneous evaluation of prosocial and pro-self employee bonus schemes: Towards a new form of management strategy for corporate social spending. Psychological Studies, 61(1), 48-54. doi:10.1007/s12646-015-0349-z
1. Mukherjee, S., Nargundkar, M., & Manjaly, J.A. (2014). Monetary primes increases differences in predicted life satisfaction between students at new and old Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs). Psychological studies, 59(2), 191-196. doi:10.1007/s12646-014-0259-5
